- Xiaomi 15 Ultra: Bigger Battery, Faster Charging
- iQOO Neo 10 Pro: Dimensity 9400 Performance, 144Hz AMOLED Display, All for $549
- Vivo S20 and Vivo S20 Pro Launch: 4500-Nit Display, 50MP Cameras, 6500mAh Battery, Starting at $314
- Is the Nubia Z70 Ultra Worth It? Features, Pricing, and Everything You Need to Know
- Samsung’s Bold Leap: Revolutionary XR Virtual Reality Glasses Set to Launch in 2025
- Latest Tech News & Mobile Specifications
- Products
- Compare
- Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison
Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison
Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison
Choosing the right smartphone can be a daunting task, with countless models vying for your attention. This comprehensive Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison will help you decide between two strong contenders in the mid-range market: the Samsung Galaxy A24 and the Vivo Y36 256GB. This Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison delves into the specifics of each device, examining their features, performance, and overall value to help you make an informed decision. This in-depth Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison aims to provide a clear picture, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each phone. The Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison is crucial for navigating the complex world of smartphone choices.
Both phones offer impressive specifications at competitive price points. However, a thorough Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison reveals key differences that cater to different user needs and preferences. This detailed Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison considers factors like display quality, camera capabilities, processing power, battery life, and overall user experience. By the end of this Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison, you’ll have a clear understanding of which phone best suits your requirements. This Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison is designed to be your ultimate guide.
Samsung Galaxy A24: A Deep Dive
The Samsung Galaxy A24 is a compelling mid-range offering from Samsung. Its key features include a vibrant 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate, providing a smooth and visually appealing user experience. The Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison highlights this display as a significant advantage for many users. The triple-camera system, featuring a 50MP main sensor with OIS, promises impressive photo and video quality. The powerful Mediatek Helio G99 processor, coupled with 8GB of RAM, ensures smooth multitasking and handles demanding apps with ease. This Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison emphasizes the efficiency of its processor. A large 5000mAh battery ensures all-day usage, and 25W fast charging provides quick top-ups. This detailed Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison reveals its strengths and weaknesses.
Vivo Y36 256GB: A Closer Look
The Vivo Y36 256GB stands out with its generous 256GB of internal storage, a significant advantage in this price range. The Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison notes this as a key differentiator. Its 6.8-inch IPS LCD display, although not AMOLED, boasts a 90Hz refresh rate, providing a similarly smooth experience. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 processor, while less powerful than the Helio G99, still delivers smooth performance for everyday tasks. A dual-camera system featuring a 50MP main sensor and a 2MP depth sensor provides adequate photo capabilities. The battery capacity matches the Samsung Galaxy A24 at 5000mAh, while offering 44W fast charging, slightly faster than the Samsung’s 25W. This Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison carefully weighs the pros and cons of both models. The Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison is essential for those looking for a detailed analysis.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison: Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison
This section provides a side-by-side Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison of key features:
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A24 | Vivo Y36 256GB |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.5-inch Super AMOLED, 90Hz | 6.8-inch IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Processor | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB |
| Storage | 128GB (expandable) | 256GB (expandable) |
| Main Camera | 50MP, OIS | 50MP |
| Battery | 5000mAh, 25W fast charging | 5000mAh, 44W fast charging |
| 5G | No | No |
| NFC | No | (Check specifications – may vary by region) |
This Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison table illustrates the key differences between the two phones.
Pros and Cons: A Balanced Perspective in this Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison
Samsung Galaxy A24 Pros: Superior display, potentially better camera performance (OIS), slightly more powerful processor.
Samsung Galaxy A24 Cons: Less storage, slower charging.
Vivo Y36 256GB Pros: Significantly more storage, faster charging.
Vivo Y36 256GB Cons: Inferior display, potentially less powerful processor, camera may be slightly less capable.
This Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison of pros and cons emphasizes the importance of considering individual needs.
Techgoody’s Verdict: Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison
The best choice in this Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison depends on your priorities. If display quality and camera performance are paramount, the Samsung Galaxy A24 is a compelling option. However, if ample storage and faster charging are more important, the Vivo Y36 256GB is the winner. Both offer excellent value in the mid-range segment. This Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison leaves the final decision to the consumer’s preferences. Both phones provide strong performance and are viable choices for those seeking a solid mid-range option. This Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison has provided a thorough evaluation of both phones.
Remember to check local pricing and availability before making a purchase. This Samsung Galaxy A24 VS Vivo Y36 256GB Comparison serves as a starting point for your research.
General
| Status | Available Available |
| Released | May, 2023 May, 2023 |
Build
| OS | Android 13 OS Android 13 OS |
| Dimensions | 162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3 mm 164.06 x 76.17 x 8.07 mm |
| Weight | 195 g 202 g |
| SIM | Dual Sim, Dual Standby (Nano-SIM) Dual Sim, Dual Standby (Nano-SIM) |
| Colors | Black; other colors Vibrant Gold, Meteor Black |
Frequency
| 2G Network |
SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G Network | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G Network | LTE LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800) |
Processor
| CPU | Octa-core (2 x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6 x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4 x 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold + 4 x 1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8781 Helio G99 (6nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 610 |
Display
| Technology | Super AMOLED Capacitive Touchscreen, Multitouch IPS LCD Capacitive Touchscreen, 16M Colors, Multitouch |
| Size | 6.5 Inches 6.8 Inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 Pixels (~406 PPI) 1080 x 2388 Pixels (~385 PPI) |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 N/a |
| Extra Features | 90Hz 90Hz, 650 nits (peak) |
Memory
| Built-in | 128GB Built-in, 8GB RAM 256GB Built-in, 8GB RAM |
| Card | microSDXC (dedicated slot) microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
Camera
| Main | Triple Camera: 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS + 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5 Dual Camera: 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF + 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth), LED Flash |
| Features | 6 10 |
| Front | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), Video (1080p@30fps) 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), HDR, Video (1080p@30fps) |
Connectivity
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | v5.2 with A2DP, LE v5.1 with A2DP, LE |
| GPS | Yes + GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS Yes + A-GPS support, & GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| NFC | No Yes |
| Data | GPRS, Edge, 3G (HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps), 4G LTE-A GPRS, Edge, 3G (HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps), 4G LTE-A |
| Infrared | N/A N/A |
| FM Radio | FM Radio (Unspecified) FM Radio |
Features
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass, Fingerprint (side-mounted), Gyro, Virtual proximity sensing Accelerometer, Compass, Fingerprint (side mounted), Gyro, Proximity |
| Audio | 3.5mm Audio Jack, Speaker Phone 3.5mm Audio Jack, 24-bit/192kHz audio, Speaker Phone |
| Browser | HTML5 HTML5 |
| Games | Built-in + Downloadable Built-in + Downloadable |
| Torch | Yes Yes |
| Extra | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back, Photo/video editor, Document viewer NFC (market/region dependent), IP54, dust and splash resistant, Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame, Document viewer, Photo/video editor |
Battery
| Capacity | (Li-Po Non removable), 5000 mAh (Li-Po Non removable), 5000 mAh |
| Charging | Fast charging 25W wired Fast charging 44W wired, 30% in 15 min (advertised), Reverse wired |
Price
| Price in USD | 223 168 |
Ratings
| Ratings | 4.6 stars 5 stars |
|
