- Xiaomi 15 Ultra: Bigger Battery, Faster Charging
- iQOO Neo 10 Pro: Dimensity 9400 Performance, 144Hz AMOLED Display, All for $549
- Vivo S20 and Vivo S20 Pro Launch: 4500-Nit Display, 50MP Cameras, 6500mAh Battery, Starting at $314
- Is the Nubia Z70 Ultra Worth It? Features, Pricing, and Everything You Need to Know
- Samsung’s Bold Leap: Revolutionary XR Virtual Reality Glasses Set to Launch in 2025
- Latest Tech News & Mobile Specifications
- Products
- Compare
- Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison: A Detailed Head-to-Head
Choosing the right smartphone can be a daunting task, especially with the sheer number of options available. This Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison aims to simplify your decision-making process by providing a detailed head-to-head analysis of two compelling mid-range contenders. This Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison will cover key features, performance, camera capabilities, battery life, and more, helping you determine which phone best suits your needs and budget. This in-depth Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison will leave you well-informed and ready to make your purchase.
Both the Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro and the Oppo K11 offer attractive features at competitive prices. However, a direct Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison reveals key differences that cater to different user preferences. Understanding these nuances is crucial for a well-informed purchase. This Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison will guide you through these details.
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison: Features and Benefits
Let’s delve into a detailed feature-by-feature Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison. Both phones offer compelling features, but their strengths lie in different areas.
Display
The Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro boasts a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, delivering smooth visuals and vibrant colors. The Oppo K11, on the other hand, features a slightly larger 6.7-inch AMOLED display, also with a high refresh rate (though the exact rate isn’t specified consistently across sources). Both offer excellent displays, making the choice here largely subjective based on personal preference for screen size.
Processor and Performance
The Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro utilizes the MediaTek Helio G99 processor, known for its efficient performance. The Oppo K11, however, uses the more powerful Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G, likely resulting in superior gaming performance and smoother multitasking in demanding applications. This Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison highlights a key differentiator in raw processing power.
Camera
Camera capabilities are another key aspect of our Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison. The Poco M6 Pro features a triple-camera system with a 64MP main sensor, offering good image quality in various conditions. The Oppo K11 also boasts a triple-camera system, but with a 50MP main sensor and potentially more advanced features depending on the final specifications. A practical comparison of image quality would require real-world testing.
Battery
Both phones pack a substantial 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life. However, a crucial difference in our Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison emerges in charging speeds. The Oppo K11 supports significantly faster 100W charging, while the Poco M6 Pro offers 67W fast charging. This difference can be a major factor depending on your daily charging habits.
Other Features
A comprehensive Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison must consider additional features. The Oppo K11 supports 5G connectivity, a significant advantage for users in areas with 5G coverage. The Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro, unfortunately, lacks 5G. Storage options also differ. The Oppo K11 includes expandable storage, while the Poco M6 Pro does not. This Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison highlights the importance of considering your connectivity and storage needs.
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison: Pros and Cons
To further clarify our Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison, let’s summarize the pros and cons of each device:
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro:
Pros: Vibrant AMOLED display, good camera system, long battery life, affordable price. Cons: No 5G, no expandable storage, less powerful processor.Oppo K11:
Pros: More powerful processor, 5G connectivity, expandable storage, incredibly fast charging. Cons: Potentially higher price (depending on final pricing), plastic build (potentially).Techgoody’s Opinion: Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison
The best choice in this Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison ultimately depends on individual priorities. The Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro excels in offering a great value proposition with a stunning display and impressive battery life at a potentially lower price point. However, the Oppo K11 pulls ahead in terms of performance, 5G connectivity, and remarkably fast charging. Our Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison suggests the Oppo K11 is the better choice for users prioritizing future-proofing with 5G and top-tier performance. But the Poco M6 Pro is a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers willing to compromise on 5G and raw processing power. This Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison should help you make an informed decision.
This Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison is intended to provide a comprehensive overview. Remember to check for the most up-to-date specifications and pricing before making your final decision. This Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison is intended to be a valuable resource for your phone-buying journey. Always double-check with official sources to validate details from this Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro VS Oppo K11 Comparison.
General
| Status | Available Coming Soon |
| Released | Aug, 2023 Aug, 2023 |
Build
| OS | Android 14 OS Android 13 OS |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 75 x 8 mm 162.7 x 75.5 x 8.2 mm |
| Weight | 179 g 184 g |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM, Dual Standby (Nano-SIM) Dual Sim, Dual Standby (Nano-SIM) |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Purple Moonshadow Gray; Glacier Blue |
Frequency
| 2G Network |
SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G Network | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G Network | LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 8(900), 34(2000), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) LTE-A |
| 5G Band | SA/NSA |
Processor
| CPU | Octa-core (2 x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6 x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1 x 2.7 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3 x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4 x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 Adreno 642L |
Display
| Technology | AMOLED Capacitive Touchscreen, Multitouch AMOLED Capacitive Touchscreen, 1B, Multitouch |
| Size | 6.67 Inches 6.7 Inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 Pixels (~395 PPI) 1080 x 2400 Pixels (~393 PPI) |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 N/a |
| Extra Features | 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) 20Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typical), 1100 nits (peak) |
Memory
| Built-in | 512GB Built-in, 12GB RAM, UFS 2.2 256/512GB Built-in, 8/12GB RAM, UFS 3.1 |
| Card | No microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
Camera
| Main | Triple Camera: 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0 Triple Camera: 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56 |
| Features | 8 6 |
| Front | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), Video (1080p@30/60fps) 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), HDR, Video (1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS) |
Connectivity
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | v5.2 with A2DP, LE v5.2 with A2DP, LE, apt-X HD |
| GPS | A-GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS Yes + GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| NFC | Yes Yes |
| Data | GPRS, Edge, 3G HSPA, 4G LTE GPRS, Edge, 3G (HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps), 4G LTE-A (CA), 5G Capable |
| Infrared | Yes Yes |
| FM Radio | FM Radio N/A |
Features
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass, Fingerprint (under display, optical), Gyro, Virtual proximity sensing Accelerometer, Compass, Fingerprint (under display, optical), Proximity |
| Audio | 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res audio, Dual Speaker 3.5mm Audio Jack, MP3/AAC+/WAV/Flac player, MP4/H.264 player, Speaker Phone |
| Browser | HTML5 HTML5 |
| Games | Built-in + Downloadable Built-in + Downloadable |
| Torch | Yes Yes |
| Extra | NFC (market/region dependent), Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, IP54, dust and splash resistant, Photo/video editor, Document viewer IP5X dustproof, Glass front, Plastic frame, Plastic back, Photo/video editor, Document viewer |
Battery
| Capacity | (Non removable), 5000 mAh (Li-Po Non removable), 5000 mAh |
| Charging | 67W wired, 100% in 44 min (advertised) Fast charging 100W wired, 100% in 26 min (advertised) |
Price
| Price in USD | $275 $316 |
Ratings
| Ratings | 1 stars 5 stars |
|
