- iQOO Neo 10 Pro: Dimensity 9400 Performance, 144Hz AMOLED Display, All for $549
- Vivo S20 and Vivo S20 Pro Launch: 4500-Nit Display, 50MP Cameras, 6500mAh Battery, Starting at $314
- Is the Nubia Z70 Ultra Worth It? Features, Pricing, and Everything You Need to Know
- Samsung’s Bold Leap: Revolutionary XR Virtual Reality Glasses Set to Launch in 2025
- Oppo to Launch Oppo Find N5 Foldable and Find X8 Ultra: Big Upgrades in Design, Camera, and Battery Revealed
- Latest Tech News & Mobile Specifications
- Products
- Compare
- Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison
Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison
Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison: A Head-to-Head Battle of Budget Smartphones
Choosing a budget smartphone can be a daunting task. There’s a sea of options, each promising value but often falling short. This Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison aims to cut through the noise, providing a detailed side-by-side analysis of two popular budget contenders. This comprehensive Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison will help you decide which phone best fits your needs and budget. We’ll delve into features, performance, pros, cons, and ultimately offer our expert opinion on which device reigns supreme in this Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison.
This Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison isn’t just about specs; it’s about understanding the user experience. Both phones target budget-conscious consumers, but their strengths and weaknesses differ significantly. This detailed Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison will explore these differences to help you make an informed decision. By the end of this Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison, you’ll have a clear picture of which phone is the better fit for you. We’ll meticulously examine every aspect in this Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison, leaving no stone unturned.
Nokia C300: A Comprehensive Review
The Nokia C300 positions itself as a no-frills, reliable budget smartphone. Its focus is on providing essential features without breaking the bank. This Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison will highlight where it excels and where it falls short.
Features and Benefits: Unpacking the Nokia C300
The Nokia C300 boasts a sizable 6.52-inch IPS LCD, offering a decent viewing experience for its price point. The 720 x 1600 pixels resolution is adequate for everyday use. Under the hood, a Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset provides reasonably smooth performance for basic tasks. The 3GB RAM and 32GB of internal storage (expandable via microSDXC) are standard for this budget segment. In this Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison, we’ll see how this compares to the Realme C51.
The triple-camera setup (13MP wide, 2MP macro, and 2MP depth) is a highlight, offering versatility for casual photography. The 4000mAh battery promises all-day usage on a single charge, a crucial aspect for any budget phone. This Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison will assess whether this battery life holds up against the Realme’s offering.
Pros and Cons: Weighing the Nokia C300
Pros: Large display, decent processor for the price, long-lasting battery, triple rear camera, expandable storage, affordable price.
Cons: Lacks 5G connectivity, basic camera features, no NFC, plastic build.
Realme C51 3GB: A Budget Smartphone That Doesn’t Compromise (Too Much)
The Realme C51 3GB enters the arena with a slightly different approach. It aims to offer a more modern experience, incorporating features usually found in slightly higher-priced devices. This Nokia C51 VS Realme C300 Comparison will reveal if it truly delivers.
Features and Benefits: What Makes the Realme C51 3GB Stand Out?
The Realme C51 3GB features a larger 6.74-inch IPS LCD with a 90Hz refresh rate. This makes scrolling and animations significantly smoother than the Nokia C300. The 720 x 1600 pixels resolution is comparable, but the higher refresh rate provides a noticeably improved user experience. The Unisoc Tiger T612 processor delivers smooth performance for everyday tasks, comparable to the Snapdragon 662 in the Nokia C300. The 3GB RAM, while modest, is sufficient for most users, and the 64GB internal storage (expandable via microSDXC) provides ample space.
The camera system features a 50MP main sensor, a significant upgrade compared to the Nokia C300. The 5000mAh battery with 33W fast charging is another key advantage, offering both longevity and quick charging capabilities. This Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison will show how these features stack up against the Nokia.
Pros and Cons: Weighing the Realme C51 3GB
Pros: Larger 90Hz display, excellent battery life with fast charging, smooth performance, expandable storage, good main camera sensor, affordable price.
Cons: Only 3GB of RAM, Camera lacks advanced features, might not be ideal for heavy gaming.
Techgoody Opinion: Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison
In this Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison, the Realme C51 3GB emerges as the slightly better option. While the Nokia C300 offers reliable performance and long battery life at a very competitive price, the Realme C51 3GB provides a more modern and enjoyable user experience. The 90Hz refresh rate display and faster charging significantly enhance everyday usability. The improved camera sensor is another plus. However, the Nokia C300 remains a solid choice for users prioritizing a simple, dependable phone without needing the extra features.
Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual priorities. If a smooth, modern experience is paramount, the Realme C51 3GB wins. If simplicity and reliability are key, the Nokia C300 is a strong contender. This Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison highlights that both phones are excellent value for money, but the Realme offers a noticeable step up in the user experience.
This Nokia C300 VS Realme C51 3GB Comparison should provide you with the information you need to make the best decision for your needs. Remember to check current pricing and availability in your region before purchasing.
General
| Status | Coming Soon Available |
| Released | Jun, 2023 Aug, 2023 |
Build
| OS | Android 12 OS Android 13 OS |
| Dimensions | 166.7 x 76.6 x 8.6 mm 167.2 x 76.7 x 8 mm |
| Weight | 190 g 186 g |
| SIM | Single SIM (Nano-SIM) Dual Sim, Dual Standby (Nano-SIM) |
| Colors | Blue Mint Green, Carbon Black |
Frequency
| 2G Network |
GSM 850 / 1900
SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G Network | HSDPA 850 / 1700 / 1900 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G Network | LTE LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 34(2000), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) |
Processor
| CPU | Octa-core (4 x 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold + 4 x 1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) Octa-core (2 x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6 x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 Mali-G57 |
Display
| Technology | IPS LCD Capacitive Touchscreen, 16M Colors, Multitouch IPS LCD Capacitive Touchscreen, 16M Colors, Multitouch |
| Size | 6.52 Inches 6.74 Inches |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 Pixels (~269 PPI) 720 x 1600 Pixels (~260 PPI) |
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass Panda Glass |
| Extra Features | 400 nits (typ) 90Hz, 560 nits (peak) |
Memory
| Built-in | 32GB Built-in, 3GB RAM 64GB Built-in, 3GB RAM |
| Card | microSDXC (dedicated slot) microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
Camera
| Main | Triple Camera: 13 MP, (wide), AF + 2 MP, (macro) + 2 MP, (depth), LED Flash Dual Camera: 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76 |
| Features | 6 5 |
| Front | 8 MP, LED Flash 5 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/5 |
Connectivity
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspot Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | v5.0 with A2DP, LE v5.0 with A2DP, LE |
| GPS | Yes + A-GPS support Yes + A-GPS support, & GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0 |
| NFC | No Yes |
| Data | GPRS, Edge, 3G (HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps), 4G (LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps) GPRS, Edge, 3G (HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps), 4G LTE-A |
| Infrared | N/A N/A |
| FM Radio | FM Radio FM Radio |
Features
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass, Fingerprint (rear mounted), Proximity Accelerometer, Compass, Fingerprint (side-mounted), Proximity |
| Audio | 3.5mm Audio Jack, MP4/H.264 player, MP3/WAV/eAAC+/WMA player, Speaker Phone 3.5mm Audio Jack, Speaker Phone |
| Browser | HTML5 HTML5 |
| Games | Built-in Built-in + Downloadable |
| Torch | Yes Yes |
| Extra | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame, Splash and dust resistant, Document viewer/editor, Photo/video editor NFC 360Ëš (market/region dependent), Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back, Photo/video editor, Document viewer |
Battery
| Capacity | (Li-Po Non removable), 4000 mAh (Li-Po Non removable), 5000 mAh |
| Charging | 10W wired Fast charging 33W wired, 0-50% in 28 min (advertised) |
Price
| Price in USD | $181 $73 |
Ratings
| Ratings | 5 stars 5 stars |
|
