- Latest Tech News & Mobile Specifications
- Products
- Compare
- Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison
Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison
Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison
Choosing the right smartphone can be a daunting task, with countless models vying for your attention. This Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison aims to simplify your decision-making process by providing a detailed side-by-side analysis of two compelling mid-range contenders: the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Oppo F25 Pro. This Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison will delve into their features, performance, pros, and cons, ultimately helping you determine which phone best suits your needs and preferences. We’ll cover everything from display quality and camera capabilities to battery life and overall value in this comprehensive Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison. Making an informed choice is crucial, and this Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison aims to provide you with all the information you need.
Samsung Galaxy A35: A Comprehensive Review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 is making waves in the mid-range market, offering a compelling blend of features and affordability. This Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison highlights its key strengths and weaknesses. The Galaxy A35 boasts a vibrant 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring a fluid and visually appealing user experience. This Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison will showcase how this feature compares to the Oppo F25 Pro. Powering the device is the Exynos 1380 processor, delivering responsive performance for everyday tasks and light gaming. Its triple-camera system, featuring a 50MP main lens, captures detailed and vibrant photos. A 5000mAh battery provides all-day power, a significant aspect of this Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison.
The Samsung Galaxy A35’s features also extend beyond its core specifications. This Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison notes the inclusion of 8GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage, further enhanced by expandable storage options. Additional features like an in-display fingerprint sensor, NFC for contactless payments, and IP67 dust and water resistance add to its appeal. This Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison will reveal how these features stack up against the Oppo F25 Pro.
Unveiling the Samsung Galaxy A35: Features and Benefits
- Vibrant 6.6-inch Super AMOLED Display (120Hz): Offers crisp visuals and a smooth user experience.
- Powerful Exynos 1380 Processor: Ensures seamless multitasking and decent gaming performance.
- Impressive 50MP Triple-Camera System: Captures stunning photos and videos.
- Long-lasting 5000mAh Battery: Provides all-day power.
- Ample Storage: 8GB RAM and 256GB internal storage (expandable).
- IP67 Water and Dust Resistance: Offers enhanced durability.
This detailed look at the features sets the stage for our in-depth Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A35: Weighing the Pros and Cons
In this Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison, we’ll balance the positive aspects against potential drawbacks.
Pros:
- Stunning Display
- Powerful Processor
- Excellent Camera System
- Long Battery Life
- Ample Storage
- IP67 Rating
Cons:
- Relatively slow charging speed
- No headphone jack
Oppo F25 Pro: A Deep Dive
Now, let’s turn our attention to the Oppo F25 Pro. This Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison will analyze its strengths and how they compare to the Samsung Galaxy A35. The Oppo F25 Pro presents a strong contender in the mid-range segment. This Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison will consider its 6.7-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, delivering a vibrant and immersive viewing experience. Powering the device is the Mediatek Dimensity 7050 processor, providing smooth performance for most tasks. Its camera system, while slightly different in specifications from the Galaxy A35, offers its own strengths. The significant battery capacity of 5000mAh coupled with 67W fast charging is another key area in this Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison.
The Oppo F25 Pro also features a sleek design and offers competitive storage options. However, this Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison will also examine its shortcomings, including the lack of NFC and wireless charging. This Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison will highlight these features to offer a balanced perspective.
Unpacking the Oppo F25 Pro: Features and Benefits
- Captivating 6.7-inch AMOLED Display (120Hz): Provides a vibrant and immersive visual experience.
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 7050 Processor: Delivers smooth and responsive performance.
- Versatile Camera System: Offers a good balance of features for various shooting needs.
- Long-lasting 5000mAh Battery with 67W Fast Charging: Ensures quick charging and all-day usage.
- Sleek Design: Offers a premium aesthetic.
Oppo F25 Pro: Weighing the Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Stunning Display
- Powerful Processor
- Good Camera System
- Long Battery Life with Fast Charging
- Sleek Design
Cons:
- Lack of NFC
- No Wireless Charging
Techgoody’s Verdict: Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison
This Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison concludes that both phones offer compelling features within the mid-range market. The Samsung Galaxy A35 shines with its IP67 rating and NFC capabilities, while the Oppo F25 Pro boasts faster charging. The ultimate choice depends on your individual priorities. If water resistance and contactless payments are crucial, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is the better option. However, if fast charging is a higher priority, the Oppo F25 Pro might be more appealing. Both offer excellent displays, powerful processors, and long battery life. This Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison helps illuminate the subtle differences that could make all the difference in your purchase decision.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
This section addresses common questions related to both devices, further supporting this Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison.
Q: Which phone has a better camera? A: Both phones have excellent camera systems; the best choice depends on individual preferences and shooting styles. This Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison only offers a general overview; detailed camera comparisons are available elsewhere.
Q: Which phone offers better value? A: Both phones offer excellent value. Pricing varies by region, so check your local market for the best deal. This Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison cannot account for fluctuating prices.
Q: Which phone is better for gaming? A: Both phones handle light to medium gaming well. Heavy gamers might want to consider phones with more powerful processors.
Ultimately, this Samsung Galaxy A35 VS Oppo F25 Pro Comparison highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each phone, guiding you towards the best choice for your individual needs and preferences. Remember to consult your local retailers for current pricing and availability.
General
| Status | Available Coming Soon |
| Released | Mar, 2024 Mar, 2024 |
Build
| OS | Android 14 OS Android 14 OS |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mm 161.1 x 74.7 x 7.5 mm |
| Weight | 209 g 177 g |
| SIM | Dual Sim, Dual Standby (Nano-SIM) Dual Sim, Dual Standby (Nano-SIM) |
| Colors | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon Ocean Blue, Lava Red |
Frequency
| 2G Network |
SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G Network | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G Network | LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500) LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 34(2000), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) |
| 5G Band | 5G SA/NSA SA/NSA |
Processor
| CPU | Octa-core (4 x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4 x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2 x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6 x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 Mali-G68 MC4 |
Display
| Technology | Super AMOLED Capacitive Touchscreen, Multitouch AMOLED Capacitive Touchscreen, 1B, Multitouch |
| Size | 6.6 Inches 6.7 Inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 Pixels (~390 PPI) 1080 x 2412 Pixels (~394 PPI) |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ Panda Glass |
| Extra Features | Always-on display, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM), 1100 nits (peak) |
Memory
| Built-in | 256GB Built-in, 8GB RAM 128/256GB Built-in, 8GB RAM, UFS 3.1 |
| Card | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) microSDXC |
Camera
| Main | Triple Camera: 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96 Triple Camera: 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0 |
| Features | 6 6 |
| Front | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74 |
Connectivity
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | v5.3 with A2DP, LE v5.2with A2DP, LE |
| GPS | Yes + GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS Yes + A-GPS support & Glonass, BDS, QZSS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| NFC | Yes No |
| Data | GPRS, EDGE, 3G (HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps), 4G LTE, 5G capable GPRS, Edge, 3G (HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps), 4G LTE-A, 5G capable |
| Infrared | N/A Yes |
| FM Radio | N/A N/A |
Features
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass, Fingerprint (under display, optical), Gyro, Virtual proximity sensing Accelerometer, Compass, Fingerprint (side-mounted), Gyro, Proximity |
| Audio | Speaker Phone 3.5mm Audio Jack, MP4/H.264/FLAC player, MP3/eAAC+/WAV player, Speaker Phone |
| Browser | HTML5 HTML5 |
| Games | Built-in + Downloadable Built-in + Downloadable |
| Torch | Yes Yes |
| Extra | NFC (market/region dependent), IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min), Glass front+ Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back, Photo/video editor, Document viewer IP65 dust/water resistant, Document editor, Photo/video editor |
Battery
| Capacity | (Li-ion Non removable), 5000 mAh (Li-Po Non removable), 5000 mAh |
| Charging | 25W wired Fast charging 67W wired, PD2.0, QC3, 100% in 48 min (advertised), Reverse wired |
Price
| Price in USD | 367 $361 |
Ratings
| Ratings | 4.3 stars 5 stars |
|
