- Vivo S20 and Vivo S20 Pro Launch: 4500-Nit Display, 50MP Cameras, 6500mAh Battery, Starting at $314
- Is the Nubia Z70 Ultra Worth It? Features, Pricing, and Everything You Need to Know
- Samsung’s Bold Leap: Revolutionary XR Virtual Reality Glasses Set to Launch in 2025
- Oppo to Launch Oppo Find N5 Foldable and Find X8 Ultra: Big Upgrades in Design, Camera, and Battery Revealed
- OnePlus 13: Everything You Need to Know About the Snapdragon 8 Elite-Powered Flagship
- Latest Tech News & Mobile Specifications
- Products
- Compare
- Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison
Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison
Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison: A Head-to-Head Battle of Budget Smartphones
Choosing a budget smartphone can be a daunting task. The market is flooded with options, each promising value but often falling short. This Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison aims to simplify your decision by providing a detailed, side-by-side analysis of two popular contenders: the Vivo Y03 and the Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB. This Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison will cover key features, pros, cons, and ultimately, our Techgoody recommendation. We’ll dive deep into the specifics to help you determine which phone best suits your needs. This Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison is essential reading before making your purchase.
Both phones target budget-conscious consumers, offering impressive specifications considering their price points. However, subtle differences exist that might sway your decision. This Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison will highlight these differences and help you make an informed choice. Understanding the nuances of this Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison is key to finding the perfect phone for you. This in-depth Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison will be your ultimate guide.
Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison: Features and Benefits
The Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison reveals some key distinctions in features. Let’s break down the key aspects of each device.
Vivo Y03: Key Features
- Display: 6.51-inch IPS LCD, 720 x 1612 pixels
- Processor: MediaTek Helio P35
- RAM: 3GB
- Storage: 32GB (expandable)
- Camera: 8MP rear, 5MP front
- Battery: 5000mAh
Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB: Key Features
- Display: 6.5-inch PLS LCD, 720 x 1600 pixels
- Processor: MediaTek Helio G85
- RAM: 4GB
- Storage: 128GB (expandable)
- Camera: 50MP rear, 5MP front
- Battery: 5000mAh
This Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison shows that while both offer large batteries, the Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB boasts superior storage and a more powerful processor. The camera specifications also favor the Samsung, with a significantly higher megapixel count on the rear camera. The Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison highlights the Samsung’s overall advantage in terms of core specifications.
Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison: Pros and Cons
This Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison wouldn’t be complete without considering the advantages and disadvantages of each phone.
Vivo Y03: Pros and Cons
Pros: Affordable price, long battery life.
Cons: Lower processing power, limited storage, less impressive camera.
Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB: Pros and Cons
Pros: More powerful processor, significantly more storage, better camera, larger display.
Cons: Slightly higher price point (though still budget-friendly).
The Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison shows that the Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB offers a more robust and feature-rich experience, although at a marginally higher cost. The Vivo Y03 remains a viable option for users seeking a truly bare-bones budget device.
Techgoody’s Opinion: Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison
In our Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB emerges as the clear winner. While the Vivo Y03 offers a decent budget option, the Samsung’s superior processor, significantly larger storage capacity (128GB!), and better camera make it a more compelling choice for most users. The extra features justify the slight price difference. The Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison strongly favors the Samsung for its overall value and performance.
However, if you’re on an extremely tight budget and need only the most basic functionality, the Vivo Y03 could suffice. But for a few extra dollars, the Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB offers a much more future-proof and enjoyable smartphone experience. This Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison concludes that the Samsung is the better long-term investment.
Conclusion: Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison
This comprehensive Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison has highlighted the key differences between these two budget smartphones. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your individual priorities and budget. If you need maximum storage and a more powerful device, the Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB is the recommended choice. If you are on a very tight budget and need the most basic functionality, the Vivo Y03 might work for you. We hope this Vivo Y03 VS Samsung Galaxy A05 128GB Comparison has helped you make an informed decision!
General
| Status | Available Available |
| Released | Mar, 2024 Oct, 2023 |
Build
| OS | Android 14 OS Android 13 OS |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm 168.8 x 78.2 x 8.8 mm |
| Weight | 185 g 195 g |
| SIM | Dual Sim, Dual Standby (Nano-SIM) Dual Sim, Dual Standby (Nano-SIM) |
| Colors | Space Black, Gem Green Black, Silver, Light Green |
Frequency
| 2G Network |
SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G Network | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G Network | LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 8(900), 28(700), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500) LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500) |
Processor
| CPU | Octa-core (2 x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6 x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2 x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6 x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm) Mediatek MT6769V/CZ Helio G85 (12nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G52 MC2 |
Display
| Technology | IPS LCD Capacitive Touchscreen, 16M Colors, Multitouch PLS LCD Capacitive Touchscreen, 16M Colors, Multitouch |
| Size | 6.6 Inches 6.7 Inches |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 Pixels (~269 PPI) 720 x 1600 Pixels (~262 PPI) |
| Protection | N/a N/a |
| Extra Features | 90Hz |
Memory
| Built-in | 64 Built-in, 4GB RAM, eMMC 5.1 128GB Built-in, 4GB RAM |
| Card | microSDXC (dedicated slot) microSDXC |
Camera
| Main | Dual Camera: 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF + 0.08 MP, f/3.0 (auxiliary lens), LED Flash Dual Camera: 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF + 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth), LED Flash |
| Features | 5 5 |
| Front | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) 8 MP, f/2.0 |
Connectivity
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | v5.0 with A2DP, LE v5.3 with A2DP, LE |
| GPS | Yes + GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS Yes + A-GPS support & Glonass, BDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0 |
| NFC | No No |
| Data | GPRS, Edge, 3G (HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps), 4G LTE GPRS, EDGE, 3G (HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps), 4G (LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps) |
| Infrared | N/A N/A |
| FM Radio | FM Radio FM Radio |
Features
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity Accelerometer, Proximity |
| Audio | MP4/H.264 player, MP3/WAV/eAAC+/FLAC player, Speaker Phone 3.5mm Audio Jack, Speaker Phone |
| Browser | HTML5 HTML5 |
| Games | Built-in + Downloadable Built-in + Downloadable |
| Torch | Yes Yes |
| Extra | IP54, dust and splash resistant, Document viewer, Photo/video editor Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame, Photo/video editor, Document viewer |
Battery
| Capacity | Li-Po Non removable 5000 mAh 5000 mAh (Li-Po Non removable) |
| Charging | - 15W wired 25W wired |
Price
| Price in USD | $86 92 |
Ratings
| Ratings | 4.3 stars 1 stars |
|
