- Xiaomi 15 Ultra: Bigger Battery, Faster Charging
- iQOO Neo 10 Pro: Dimensity 9400 Performance, 144Hz AMOLED Display, All for $549
- Vivo S20 and Vivo S20 Pro Launch: 4500-Nit Display, 50MP Cameras, 6500mAh Battery, Starting at $314
- Is the Nubia Z70 Ultra Worth It? Features, Pricing, and Everything You Need to Know
- Samsung’s Bold Leap: Revolutionary XR Virtual Reality Glasses Set to Launch in 2025
- Latest Tech News & Mobile Specifications
- Products
- Compare
- Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison
Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison
Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison: A Detailed Head-to-Head
Choosing the right smartphone can be a daunting task, especially with so many options available. This Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison aims to simplify your decision-making process by providing a detailed head-to-head analysis of two popular contenders in the budget-friendly segment: the Vivo Y200e and the Samsung Galaxy A35. This Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison will cover key features, performance, pros, cons, and our overall opinion to help you determine which phone best suits your needs. This in-depth Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison will leave you well-informed.
Both phones offer compelling features at competitive price points. However, a thorough Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison reveals significant differences that cater to different user preferences. Our Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison will help you navigate these differences and make an informed choice.
Vivo Y200e: A Comprehensive Review
The Vivo Y200e aims to impress with its blend of style and performance. This Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison will highlight its key features. The Vivo Y200e presents itself as a strong contender in the budget market. This Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison will dissect its strengths and weaknesses.
Features and Benefits: Why You’ll Love the Vivo Y200e
The Vivo Y200e boasts a captivating 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a vibrant 1080 x 2400 pixel resolution and a smooth 120Hz refresh rate. The display is exceptionally bright, making it easy to view even in direct sunlight. This Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison highlights a key advantage. The impressive display technology in the Vivo Y200e is a major selling point.
Powering the device is the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 processor, coupled with 6GB or 8GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage. This combination delivers smooth multitasking and responsive performance for everyday tasks. This Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison focuses on performance aspects.
The camera system includes a 50MP main camera with PDAF, a 2MP depth sensor, and a dedicated flicker sensor. This setup captures detailed and vibrant photos, even in challenging lighting conditions. The 16MP front-facing camera is equally capable. The camera capabilities of the Vivo Y200e are a significant part of this Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison.
A massive 5000mAh battery ensures all-day power, while 44W fast charging ensures quick top-ups. This Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison analyzes battery performance.
Pros and Cons of the Vivo Y200e
Pros:
- Stunning AMOLED Display
- Powerful Processor for Everyday Use
- Excellent Battery Life
- Fast Charging
- Impressive Camera System
- Competitive Price Point
Cons:
- No NFC
- Shared SIM Slot (SIM2/MicroSD)
- Mid-range Processor (may struggle with high-end gaming)
Techgoody Opinion on the Vivo Y200e
The Vivo Y200e offers excellent value for money. Its strong points are its display, battery life, and camera. This Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison concludes that, despite the absence of NFC and the shared SIM slot, it’s a solid choice for budget-conscious users. The Vivo Y200e excels in everyday usability within this Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A35: A Comprehensive Review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 is another strong contender in the mid-range market. This Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison will analyze its features against the Vivo Y200e.
Unveiling the Samsung Galaxy A35: Features and Benefits
The Samsung Galaxy A35 features a 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate. While not as large as the Vivo Y200e’s display, it still offers vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. This Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison highlights display differences.
Under the hood is the Exynos 1380 (5nm) processor, offering good performance for everyday tasks and gaming. It’s paired with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage, expandable via microSDXC. The performance difference between the two phones is a key element in this Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison.
The camera system consists of a 50MP main lens, an 8MP ultrawide lens, and a 2MP macro lens. The additional ultrawide lens provides more versatility compared to the Vivo Y200e. This aspect of the Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison highlights camera versatility.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 also includes a 5000mAh battery, offering all-day power. However, its 25W charging speed is slower than the Vivo Y200e’s 44W fast charging. The charging speed is another crucial factor within this Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison.
Additional features include an in-display fingerprint sensor, NFC for contactless payments, and an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance. These features are important differentiators highlighted in this Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A35: Weighing the Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Stunning Super AMOLED Display
- Powerful Processor
- Versatile Triple-Camera System
- Long Battery Life
- Ample Storage
- IP67 Water and Dust Resistance
- NFC
Cons:
- Slower Charging Speed
- No Headphone Jack
Techgoody Opinion: Samsung Galaxy A35 Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A35 is a strong contender, particularly for users who value features like NFC and water resistance. This Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison suggests that, while the charging speed is a drawback, its overall feature set makes it a compelling choice. The Samsung Galaxy A35 holds its own in this Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison.
Conclusion: Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison
The choice between the Vivo Y200e and Samsung Galaxy A35 ultimately depends on your priorities. The Vivo Y200e offers a stunning AMOLED display and incredibly fast charging, while the Samsung Galaxy A35 provides NFC, water resistance, and a more versatile camera system. This Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison provides a detailed overview to help you choose the best phone for your needs. Carefully consider the features highlighted in this Vivo Y200e VS Samsung Galaxy A35 Comparison before making your decision.
General
| Status | Coming Soon Available |
| Released | Feb, 2024 Mar, 2024 |
Build
| OS | Android 14 OS Android 14 OS |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm 161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mm |
| Weight | 185 g 209 g |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM, Dual Standby, (Nano-SIM) Dual Sim, Dual Standby (Nano-SIM) |
| Colors | Black Diamond, Saffron Delight Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
Frequency
| 2G Network |
SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G Network | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G Network | LTE band 1(2100), 5(850), 8(900), 40(2300) LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 20(800), 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2500) |
| 5G Band | SA/NSA 5G SA/NSA |
Processor
| CPU | Octa-core (2 x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6 x 1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4 x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4 x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 Mali-G68 MP5 |
Display
| Technology | AMOLED Capacitive Touchscreen, Multitouch Super AMOLED Capacitive Touchscreen, Multitouch |
| Size | 6.67 Inches 6.6 Inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 Pixels (~395 PPI) 1080 x 2340 Pixels (~390 PPI) |
| Protection | N/a Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Extra Features | 120Hz, 1800 nits (peak) Always-on display, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
Memory
| Built-in | 128GB Built-in, 6/8GB RAM, UFS 2.2 256GB Built-in, 8GB RAM |
| Card | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
Camera
| Main | Dual Camera: 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth), LED Flash Triple Camera: 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96 |
| Features | 10 6 |
| Front | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), Video (1080p@30fps) 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06 |
Connectivity
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | v5.2 with A2DP, LE v5.3 with A2DP, LE |
| GPS | Yes + AGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS Yes + GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| NFC | No Yes |
| Data | GPRS, Edge, 3G (HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps), 4G LTE-A, 5G capable GPRS, EDGE, 3G (HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps), 4G LTE, 5G capable |
| Infrared | N/A N/A |
| FM Radio | N/A N/A |
Features
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass, Fingerprint (under display, optical), Gyro, Proximity, flicker Accelerometer, Compass, Fingerprint (under display, optical), Gyro, Virtual proximity sensing |
| Audio | 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res audio, Dual Speaker Speaker Phone |
| Browser | HTML5 HTML5 |
| Games | Built-in + Downloadable Built-in + Downloadable |
| Torch | Yes Yes |
| Extra | Glass front, plastic or silicone polymer (eco leather) back, IP54, dust and splash resistant, Document viewer, Photo/video editor NFC (market/region dependent), IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min), Glass front+ Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back, Photo/video editor, Document viewer |
Battery
| Capacity | (Li-ion Non removable), 5000 mAh (Li-ion Non removable), 5000 mAh |
| Charging | 44W wired, 1-32% in 15 min (advertised) 25W wired |
Price
| Price in USD | $316 367 |
Ratings
| Ratings | 5 stars 4.3 stars |
|
