- Xiaomi 15 Ultra: Bigger Battery, Faster Charging
- iQOO Neo 10 Pro: Dimensity 9400 Performance, 144Hz AMOLED Display, All for $549
- Vivo S20 and Vivo S20 Pro Launch: 4500-Nit Display, 50MP Cameras, 6500mAh Battery, Starting at $314
- Is the Nubia Z70 Ultra Worth It? Features, Pricing, and Everything You Need to Know
- Samsung’s Bold Leap: Revolutionary XR Virtual Reality Glasses Set to Launch in 2025
- Latest Tech News & Mobile Specifications
- Products
- Compare
- Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison
Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison
Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison
Choosing between the Xiaomi Poco F6 and the Oppo Reno 11 Pro can be tough. Both offer compelling features at competitive price points. This Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison will delve into the specifics, helping you make an informed decision. This in-depth Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison will cover key aspects to help you choose the best phone for your needs. A comprehensive Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison is essential before committing to a purchase. This Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison aims to be your ultimate guide.
Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro: Feature Comparison
This Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison highlights the key differences in features. Both phones offer impressive specifications, but their strengths lie in different areas. The Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison reveals a clear distinction in processing power and battery life.
- Processor: Xiaomi Poco F6 boasts the Snapdragon 870 5G, while the Oppo Reno 11 Pro features the MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra. The Snapdragon 870 is a powerful processor but the Dimensity 8200 offers improved graphics capabilities. In this Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison, the Dimensity 8200-Ultra edges out slightly.
- Display: Both phones feature stunning AMOLED displays with high refresh rates. The Poco F6 offers a slightly higher refresh rate (120Hz) compared to the Reno 11 Pro (90Hz). However, the Reno 11 Pro might offer superior color accuracy and brightness.
- Camera: The camera systems are quite different. The Poco F6 typically features a 64MP main sensor, whereas the Reno 11 Pro often has a 50MP main sensor paired with a high-resolution ultrawide lens. The Reno 11 Pro frequently emphasizes portrait photography, while the Poco F6 leans towards versatile image capture. This Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison shows a preference for the Reno 11 Pro for its dedicated portrait mode.
- Battery: The Poco F6 often packs a larger battery (around 5000mAh) than the Reno 11 Pro (around 4500mAh), leading to potentially longer battery life. Charging speeds are comparable, with both supporting fast charging. In this Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison, the Poco F6 wins on battery capacity.
- Price: The Xiaomi Poco F6 is usually positioned as a more budget-friendly option compared to the Oppo Reno 11 Pro, making this a crucial element in the Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison.
This detailed Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison provides a clear picture of the key differences between these two phones.
Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro: Pros and Cons
Let’s break down the advantages and disadvantages of each phone in this Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison.
Xiaomi Poco F6: Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Excellent performance for the price.
- Long battery life.
- High refresh rate display.
- Affordable price.
Cons:
- Camera quality might not match high-end flagships.
- Software updates might be less frequent.
Oppo Reno 11 Pro: Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Powerful processor for smooth performance.
- Excellent camera system with dedicated portrait capabilities.
- Stylish design.
- Fast charging.
Cons:
- Generally more expensive than the Poco F6.
- Smaller battery compared to the Poco F6.
- No expandable storage.
This Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison helps you weigh the pros and cons of each phone.
Techgoody’s Verdict: Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro
The best phone for you depends on your priorities. The Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison shows that the Poco F6 excels in offering excellent value for money. Its long battery life and powerful processor make it a great choice for users on a budget. However, if you prioritize camera quality, especially portrait photography, and don’t mind paying a premium, the Oppo Reno 11 Pro is the better option. The Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison ultimately boils down to your individual needs and budget.
This Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison aims to provide a clear and unbiased assessment of both phones. Consider your priorities, and make an informed choice based on your needs. Remember to check for the latest pricing and availability in your region before making a final decision. This Xiaomi Poco F6 VS Oppo Reno 11 Pro Comparison is intended as a guide only.
General
| Status | Available Coming Soon |
| Released | May, 2024 Jan, 2024 |
Build
| OS | Android 14 OS Android 14 OS |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 74.5 x 8 mm 163 x 74.2 x 8.19mm |
| Weight | 179 g 190 g |
| SIM | Dual Sim, Dual Standby (Nano-SIM) Dual Sim, Dual Standby (Nano-SIM) |
| Colors | Black, Green, Titanium Pearl White, Rock Grey |
Frequency
| 2G Network |
SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM1: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 SIM2: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G Network | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G Network | LTE LTE band 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700), 17(700), 20(800), 34(2000), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) |
| 5G Band | SA/NSA SA/NSA |
Processor
| CPU | Octa-core (1 x 3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 + 4 x 2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3 x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (1x 3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 + 3 x 3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4 x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 Mali-G610 MP6 |
Display
| Technology | AMOLED Capacitive Touchscreen, 68B, Multitouch AMOLED Capacitive Touchscreen, 1B, Multitouch |
| Size | 6.67 Inches 6.7 Inches |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 Pixels (~446 PPI) 1080 x 2412 Pixels (~394 PPI) |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus Asahi Glass AGC |
| Extra Features | 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
Memory
| Built-in | 256/512GB Built-in, 8/12GB RAM, UFS 4.0 256/512GB Built-in, 12GB RAM, UFS 3.1 |
| Card | microSD Card, (supports up to 512GB) No |
Camera
| Main | Dual Camera: 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.95 Triple Camera: 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56 |
| Features | 8 7 |
| Front | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), HDR, Video (1080p@30/60fps) 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74 |
Connectivity
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | v5.4 with A2DP, LE v5.3 with A2DP, LE, apt-X HD, LHDC |
| GPS | A-GPS support & Glonass, BDS, QZSS, (B1I+B1c) Yes + GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| NFC | Yes Yes |
| Data | GPRS, Edge, 3G (HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps), 4G LTE, 5G Capable GPRS, Edge, 3G (HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps), 4G LLTE-A (CA), 5G capable |
| Infrared | Yes Yes |
| FM Radio | FM Radio N/A |
Features
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass, FingerPrint (under display, optical), Gyro, Proximity Accelerometer, Compass, Fingerprint (under display, optical), Gyro, Proximity |
| Audio | 24-bit/192kHz Hi-Res & Hi-Res wireless audio, Speaker Phone 24-bit/192kHz audio, Speaker Phone |
| Browser | HTML5 HTML5 |
| Games | Built-in + Downloadable Built-in + Downloadable |
| Torch | Yes Yes |
| Extra | NFC (market/region dependent), IP64, dust and water resistant, Photo/video editor, Document viewer Glass front, plastic frame, glass back, Document editor, Photo/video editor |
Battery
| Capacity | (Non removable), 5000 mAh (Li-Po Non removable), 4600 mAh |
| Charging | Fast battery 90W wired, PD3.0, 2-100% in 35 min (advertised) 80W wired, PD, QC3, 45% in 10 min (advertised), Reverse wired |
Price
| Price in USD | 609 $609 |
Ratings
| Ratings | 5 stars 5 stars |
|
